Walmart recently said it plans to deploy robots to scan shelves, scrub floors and perform other mundane tasks in its stores because the retail giant seeks to lower labor costs.

While the retail giant didn’t say which jobs, if any, may be lost because of this, the announcement – and the various more surely to follow at other big box retailers – begs the query: How can employees prepare for a way forward for increasingly automated work?

Millions of today’s jobs are expected to be affected by artificial intelligence and automation as a part of the “fourth industrial revolution.” But just which occupations are most in danger has been a guessing game amongst economists, futurists and students attempting to predict winners and losers.

As experts on employees’ identities and careers and industry and technological change, we developed a brand new tool we imagine will help employees more accurately determine the fate of their professions – and work out how best to arrange.

Who might be hurt

A bunch of research studies have examined where industrial revolution 4.0 is prone to wield its biggest impact.

Driven by a give attention to cost and efficiency, most predictions pit one team of workers against one other. For example, blue collar versus white collar, expert versus unskilled, college-educated versus not college-educated and even predictions by race and gender.

While these broad groupings may grab headlines, they provide little guidance to individual employees at a time when, greater than ever, individuals are expected to take responsibility for managing and driving their very own careers.

Rather than give attention to efficiency or cost, our research offers a more nuanced and sustainable tool for examining the fate of 1’s career: value.

While humans will still value the talents of a school professor in the long run, AI and online learning tools are threatening the way in which those abilities are delivered.
AP Photo/Matt Rourke

Worker value

Our research is predicated on the concept every individual’s work creates value in his or her day-to-day job.

That value could also be something a customer pays for, may enable co-workers to do their very own jobs or may help the corporate to operate internally. In any case, every job provides a point of value or usefulness to a different party. The value is constant, but the way in which it’s created and delivered to the tip user might be threatened by automation and AI. Only after we’ve evaluated that may we determine how the approaching wave of technological change will affect a job’s future prospects. To assess these threats, we want to interrupt value down into two key components.

First, value is created by the talents required to finish a job, akin to a programmer’s ability to code or a painter’s knack at prepping a wall and applying paint cleanly. In general, we’ve found that when skills are standardized, they usually tend to be threatened by automation or AI.

The second component of value, though, is separate from skills. It’s the tactic of delivering a job’s value to another person, which can be threatened by latest technology. We call this “value form.”

For example, while a university professor’s skills and expertise in a specific domain might not be under immediate threat, the shape wherein their value is delivered is definitely threatened by online learning platforms and the increased use of AI education tools.

By considering these two threats together, employees can higher assess if their jobs are in danger.

Displaced or durable

Our framework has 4 categories: A job might be displaced, disrupted, deconstructed or durable depending on the extent of threat facing its skills and value form.

This value matrix helps employees assess the threat their occupations face based on the 2 components of value.
Latham and Humberd, MIT Sloan Management Review, Author provided

Displaced signifies the roles which are most in peril. Our evaluation shows pharmacists, radiologists and librarians all belong within the displaced category.

Disrupted means the talents are highly threatened, but people desire the recognized or current approach to delivery, which frequently involves a human interaction. Examples include fast food servers, accountants and real estate agents.

Deconstructed flips those two around: The skills are hardly standardized but automation poses a serious threat to how the job’s value is delivered. Photographers, college professors and livery drivers are on this category.

Durable jobs are the safest ones because each the talents and the worth form are difficult or costly to automate. Lucky employees on this category include electricians, plumbers and physician assistants.

What we learn from value

In some ways, the worth framework confirms what others have found.

For example, nobody would have argued that shelf stockers at big box retailers like Walmart could be a protected job for years to return – because the retailer’s announcement confirms. Putting them in our framework, their primary skills of keeping inventory stocked and shelves clean are severely threatened because they’re standardized and routine.

Furthermore, robots can deliver more value through automated transmission of inventory information. Thus, our model shows these employees will almost definitely be displaced.

However, our give attention to value suggests that other predictions based merely on categories of at-risk jobs could also be missing the mark. For example, some people predict many roles are threatened just because they’re routine, non-college-educated or blue-collar, like plumbers, electricians and hospice employees. Yet, rewiring an electrical system in a historic home or caring for a hospice patient are nonstandard jobs that require a human to create and deliver value, which is why these jobs might be quite durable.

Walmart shelf stockers are in danger as automation takes over.
Reuters/Mike Blake

What employees can do

Once employees understand the worth they create and the threat automation poses to their skills and value form, what actions can they take?

The common answer they’ve been given so far involves encouraging them to interact in lifelong learning. But a give attention to value the way in which our model does provides far more nuanced guidance.

Workers in deconstructed jobs, for instance, don’t need latest skills. They just have to learn to adapt existing skills to latest types of delivery. Conversely, employees in disrupted jobs need training to work alongside robots and AI systems in periods of transition.

And even when displaced employees – a fate that’s prone to be on the horizon for Walmart’s shelf stockers – need to think about retraining, the normal higher education system is not well suited for the long run of labor. Universities give attention to the longer-term bachelor’s-to-master’s pathway. Rather, individuals need access to quick, modular and adaptable pathways to latest jobs.

The 48-year-old parent who just lost his job as an accountant shouldn’t be capable of begin a brand new four-year degree program. But a three-month program to earn a cybersecurity certificate could be doable and all he needs.

The way forward for work is already here. Days after Walmart’s announcement, employees at Stop & Shop, a big regional grocery chain within the Boston area, are striking over increased automation. But now we have time. Let’s worry less about robots and AI itself and more in regards to the value employees can create in several jobs in a landscape that can proceed to vary for years to return. Value is the one constant.

This article was originally published at