Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized many various industries in recent times. It gained loads of attention and recognition with the launch of ChatGPT, a tool able to writing poems, solving equations and producing articles on different topics.

With the fast-paced implementation of AI in numerous fields, will it take the place of architects and architecture schools soon? To answer this query, we’d like to know the capabilities of AI and the role of architects and architecture schools.

Architectural education

While the topics and research surrounding AI are rapidly evolving, AI lacks certain qualities and characteristics that architects gain by completing architecture school. At its core, architects learn methods to use different skills to mix technical knowledge, arts, esthetics, emotions and other attributes.

Architecture schools train their students in order that they’ll reply to certain design problems with solutions based on their personal experiences, design styles and other aspects.

Architecture curricula still needs to include traditional design skills.

Creativity and progressive solutions are a result of mixing different skill sets, personal experiences and technical knowledge that future architects develop in architecture schools.

The same process exists relating to AI. AI is trained on different datasets to give you solutions. In some cases, like ChatGPT, it uses this dataset to generate latest and progressive solutions.

But AI is restricted by its datasets, especially when there isn’t enough data, or gathering it is just too resource-intensive. This is the fundamental difference between humans and AI comes. Humans can draw on their experiences, skills and other attributes to give you progressive solutions without being limited to specific datasets.

Improved efficiency

AI has different capabilities that may significantly help many various industries, including architecture and construction. For instance, AI may help architects with architectural programming and creating layouts in buildings. It can provide renders and other varieties of visualizations.

In general, AI could make many various processes, reminiscent of schematic design and renders, more efficient. Architects can develop customized platforms based on their guiding principles, visions, design styles and other values.

However, assistive tools that lead to a final product might interrupt the training process at schools. Students are presupposed to learn skills by exploring different design solutions, ideas and philosophies. But architecture students won’t fully engage with learning in the event that they use assistive tools that conceal or eliminate the method.

Therefore, architecture schools should rigorously study how AI may be integrated with their syllabi to enhance the training process for architecture students.

a 3D model of a green building with rolled up design plans next to it
Architecture schools should teach students methods to use AI technologies, but be sure that they still acquire needed skills.

Absence of true empathy

Beyond architecture schools, understanding the importance of the shared values, heritage and cultural qualities of a community, or perhaps a person, is crucial for architects in coming up with design solutions.

While AI is able to analyzing such information, it cannot truly empathize with and understand these different considerations.

At the identical time, decisions made by architects carry responsibilities and liabilities. Students study sustainability issues, long-term impacts of designs, ecological footprints and other similar topics.

Although AI may be supplied with decision-making capabilities, it cannot replace architects’ roles in ethical decision-making process.

In addition, architecture involves collaborations amongst different stakeholders, from clients to interior designers, civil engineers and other experts. Although AI can engage in dialogue, it lacks the flexibility to interact in dynamic interactions and truly understand the intentions and experiences of various stakeholders.

Human indispensability

AI remains to be in its early stages and will actually improve significantly in the approaching years. However, in the intervening time, it seems unlikely to switch the indispensable role of architecture schools and designers since it cannot fully grasp cultural values and heritage.

In addition, AI cannot draw on personal experiences, emotions and perceptions of various concepts and designs. In its current state, AI cannot engage in meaningful collaborations where it might truly understand the necessity of various stakeholders. Furthermore, the moral issues, responsibilities and liabilities involved have to be addressed before progressing to more advanced stages that can provide AI more freedom within the design process.

Although AI can significantly improve the efficiency of the design process and improve the training experience, it’s too early to think about it — at the same time as a semi-independent entity — throughout the architectural design process.

This article was originally published at